All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 719 posts ]  Go to page Previous 114 15 16 17 1872 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:16 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Building now.

Upsampling latency for processing sample rate back to input sample rate (44.1 kHz --> 176.4 kHz or 48 kHz --> 192 kHz) was 128 samples (512 for latency 1024), now 0.

Downsampling latency is still there (but I think I can also reduce it to very close to 0). If your input is 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz, that's no issue.

FM upsampling still causes some latency also -> will be fixed.

Composite limiter also causes a bit of latency -> that will be more tricky to fix (and I'll have to check how much it is, if it's just 1 ms it might not be worth the effort). --> Edit: I think it's only 0.7 ms; 2.8 ms for latency 4096. I'll measure it later to be sure, but if it's really that low it's acceptable for now.

(The issue here is: Non-FM output has exactly the latency as specified, eg. 512, 1024, 2048 or 4096 samples. FM output has some extra latency. Which is bad. And it can be solved.)


One thing does cause a much bigger latency: FM Transmitter calibration. 512 samples at low latencies, 2048 at latency 4096. If I want to fix that, I'll probably also have to fix the 0.7 ms composite limiter latency...


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:53 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
- Issue with manually changed multiband frequencies fixed
- Slightly lower latency if input sample rate is above 60 kHz.

BETA601-005:
Winamp DSP plugin: http://www.stereotool.com/download/dsp_ ... 01-005.exe
Stand alone version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... 01-005.exe
VST version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/vst_ ... 01-005.dll
VST version (No SSE2): http://www.stereotool.com/download/vst_ ... 01-005.dll
Command line version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... 01-005.exe
Linux command line version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... ETA601-005 [not available]
Linux GUI version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... ETA601-005 [not available]


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:15 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:59 pm
Posts: 36
Thanks for the quick response Hans, but there is still an issue with the 4096 latency setting. The whole audio sounds like it is being chopped by a low frequency square wave.

_________________
J0HN II


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:33 am 

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:04 pm
Posts: 201
HanzZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzz you are the best!!!!

BUT, i ve got 2 simple questions that matters :))

1 ) is " bass boost " ....BEFORE the " bandpass filter " ??

2 ) how does the " dirty bass " work ? can i use it for FM broadcast ?


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:26 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
John: I'll run a test with your settings.

camclone:
1: No, afterwards!
2: It just tries a little less hard to avoid bass distortion. You can definitely use it for FM broadcasts (or anything else). Some people like the effect, others don't.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:02 am 

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:26 pm
Posts: 885
Quote:
camclone:
1: No, afterwards!
2: It just tries a little less hard to avoid bass distortion. You can definitely use it for FM broadcasts (or anything else). Some people like the effect, others don't.
In regards to his question, and partially to do with mine that's unanswered about the clipping in multiband:

Does the "Maximum boost from" slider then take into account the setting in bandpass and shift the boost start point up to the highpass setting? In other words, I have a highpass at 35 Hz, which is supposedly the bottom-end of my Logitech Z-2200s. If I leave the Maximum boost slider at 0, is the max boost at 0 or 35?


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:37 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
FM Output latency. That's important! And there is one thing there. Standalone.
At buffer size i can't set it under 0.02sec using Juli@ and Asio. 0.02sec mean 20ms. Is it really 20ms? I know that asio can go almost to 2ms (4ms safe).
If i try to set under 0.02sec stuttering occures. Just checked again at transmitter site 0.017sec is minimal what i can set, currently it is at 0.018.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:21 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
FM Output latency. That's important! And there is one thing there. Standalone.
At buffer size i can't set it under 0.02sec using Juli@ and Asio. 0.02sec mean 20ms. Is it really 20ms? I know that asio can go almost to 2ms (4ms safe).
If i try to set under 0.02sec stuttering occures. Just checked again at transmitter site 0.017sec is minimal what i can set, currently it is at 0.018.
With what latency setting is this?

Processing takes some CPU time. If the latency is higher, more data needs to be processed - in bursts.

If this occurs at latency 512 etc., something is really wrong. At latency 4096 I would expect something like this. (Basically, the minimum setting would be 4096 samples / 2 * CPU load, so for a CPU load of 50% (at the core where ST runs), that would be 2048 / 44100 * .5 = 23 ms.

If the latency is 512 samples, the minimum ASIO latency would drop to 256 / 44100 * .5 = 3 ms.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:29 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
camclone:
1: No, afterwards!
2: It just tries a little less hard to avoid bass distortion. You can definitely use it for FM broadcasts (or anything else). Some people like the effect, others don't.
In regards to his question, and partially to do with mine that's unanswered about the clipping in multiband:

Does the "Maximum boost from" slider then take into account the setting in bandpass and shift the boost start point up to the highpass setting? In other words, I have a highpass at 35 Hz, which is supposedly the bottom-end of my Logitech Z-2200s. If I leave the Maximum boost slider at 0, is the max boost at 0 or 35?
First any audio below 35 Hz is removed (well, theoretically. The filter isn't that good. It does get very strict when you select 'non-phase linear' filtering.

Then it just processes the audio. At that point it doesn't matter whether there was audio below 35 Hz in the input signal or not: It's not there anymore so nothing is done with it.

So audio below 35 Hz 'does not exist' as far as the Bass Boost filter is concerned. And it doesn't matter why it doesn't exist (wasn't there in the first place, or was filtered out).

Hope this answers your question...


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.00
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:31 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Thanks for the quick response Hans, but there is still an issue with the 4096 latency setting. The whole audio sounds like it is being chopped by a low frequency square wave.
Is that new in this new BETA (005)? If so, are you using a higher (> 48 kHz) input sampling rate? I don't fully trust my new upsampling filter yet...


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 719 posts ]  Go to page Previous 114 15 16 17 1872 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited