All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 4:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2023 11:45 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Radio Kraków, Poland
Hey everyone,

Working on a preset for the station I'm working for, but I've got a long way to go I think.
Looking for feedback on current settings.

Goals:
- I wanted to glue everything through dense highs,
- Everything else should breathe as much as possible.

For modern music: alternative, general rock, EDM.

What do you think? What stands out for good and bad?

Cheers and much love!
Niv


Attachments:
Niv's Adaptive 3.0 HD.sts [166.61 KiB]
Downloaded 297 times
Niv's Adaptive 1.0 HD.sts [166.02 KiB]
Downloaded 337 times


Last edited by Nivailo on Mon May 20, 2024 7:32 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 6:06 pm 

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2023 3:39 pm
Posts: 90
I like it, very open indeed. :) Maybe just a little de-esser at around -3 - -5 to take care of some harsher peaks here and there?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 3:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2023 11:45 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Radio Kraków, Poland
Hey guys, thanks for feedback!!

Version 2.0

- changed the philosophy of first multiband entirely

Hopefully results in:
- ever present, dense and glued highs
- punch in lows
- breathing mids
- better overall coloring

SteroTool 10.30 required.

Let me know what do you think :)


Attachments:
Niv's Adaptive 2.0 HD.sts [166.46 KiB]
Downloaded 265 times
Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 3:42 pm 

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2023 3:39 pm
Posts: 90
I personally like the first version much better - on version 2 vocals sound too compressed to me.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 4:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2023 11:45 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Radio Kraków, Poland
Quote:
I personally like the first version much better - on version 2 vocals sound too compressed to me.
Bah, quite right. Lost reference along the way.
Back to work :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:31 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2023 11:45 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Radio Kraków, Poland
Lots of additional beers made this:

2.5
- tried to unlock some mids
- I moved things here and there and - though dense - I quite like the results.

Take a listen.


Attachments:
Niv's Adaptive 2.5 HD.sts [166.46 KiB]
Downloaded 262 times
Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:05 am 

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2023 3:39 pm
Posts: 90
Version 1 still sounds better, on 2.5 bass is more/too compressed. :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:01 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2022 10:39 am
Posts: 61
Quote:
Version 1 still sounds better, on 2.5 bass is more/too compressed. :)
Yes, Martin, my friend, you are right. I'm still interested in how you would modify this 1 adaptive and how you think it would sound better. It sounds good to me with the fact that it lacks a high tone. Now he tried to do it, but really the bass here is compressed too much at 2 0 and 2 5. I'm interested in 1 what kind of tone you would make here, because I have no doubts about you.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 2:50 pm 

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2023 3:39 pm
Posts: 90
Quote:
Quote:
Version 1 still sounds better, on 2.5 bass is more/too compressed. :)
Yes, Martin, my friend, you are right. I'm still interested in how you would modify this 1 adaptive and how you think it would sound better. It sounds good to me with the fact that it lacks a high tone. Now he tried to do it, but really the bass here is compressed too much at 2 0 and 2 5. I'm interested in 1 what kind of tone you would make here, because I have no doubts about you.
Thank you. :) Maybe something like this?


Attachments:
Niv's Adaptive 1.0 HD+Martin's bass fix.sts [166.75 KiB]
Downloaded 311 times
Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:54 am 

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2023 3:39 pm
Posts: 90
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:


Yes, Martin, my friend, you are right. I'm still interested in how you would modify this 1 adaptive and how you think it would sound better. It sounds good to me with the fact that it lacks a high tone. Now he tried to do it, but really the bass here is compressed too much at 2 0 and 2 5. I'm interested in 1 what kind of tone you would make here, because I have no doubts about you.
Thank you. :) Maybe something like this?
IMO worst version of all of them The Mids and Highs are way to high and even the Treble could a little high the audio sounds way to muffled staticy in this version.
I noticed myself that for some reason the sound image did change a little beyond bass, despite only tweaking bass settings. I guess compressor and AGC settings for all bands will have to be adjusted too.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited