Quote:
I have FM demos from many processors and now when i listen new default settings from ST, the difference with 'highs' is even greater.
I know you like 'Highs', me too, but again i know 'someone' again complains on to much highs in ST.
Someone like me (though I am not into FM).
Quote:
10 bands in MB are already very good. But I think to make it perfect we need two additional bands (to avoid the high frequency problems we have to fight).
From my experience the problem is that bands at 5.5k, 10k, 16k is too broadly defined.
Adding two bands at 8k and 13k would help (especially for FM where 16k band is not very usefull at all). 8k is a very special and important frequency. Many de-essing tools use this as standard (default) working frequency.
Until now we have the problem that 10k has to do (almost) all the work in (the most important) high frequency range

uneasy compromise !
viewtopic.php?p=6432#p6432
A 12 band multiband would be a potent argument for a Stereo Tool V6 release (so not tomorrow, but something to add in the future).
Plus additional bands (12 too) for the noise gate (this would be a very good multiband expander functionality).
12 bands (especially) in multiband compressor/limiter would open doors to a new quality level of somehow intelligent presets for real enhancement especially for old music.
With 12 bands it would be possible to create a good sounding adaptive EQ.
As good as the original music (plus competive loudness) is not enough.
It should sound better (adaptive spectral balanced) than the original.
I don't know if Hans has other (maybe more important than Stereo Tool development) software projects in the future ?
But if Stereo Tool keeps in focus, I have some (weird) ideas for the future.