All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:29 pm 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 334
Well you could just increase the input level of the preset, say +10 dB, and decrease the output level (of the preset or your amplifier) by the same amount, i.e. -10 dB. (As far as I remember RG normalizes to -14 dBFS, but it isn't peak based, so you probably cannot use that exact number.) Of course ST processing will alter the loudness itself though, usually making it even more consistent. So everything should work out nicely.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 7:21 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
The stand alone version has a slider for this, the plug-ins don't... and I guess they should as well.

For now, try what happens if you increase Pre Amp and (very important!!) disable the noise gate.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:29 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:55 pm
Posts: 70
Bojcha's preset does have an better control of the loud S sounds, but overall the sound is not what i'm looking for.
I know that Hans' motivation for StereoTool is that some processors make the s sound like an f or something like that.
Hans does not like that, and voila, Stereotool was born.

So if Hans decides to leave it this way, i'm fine with it, but i think i will go look for another processor because i can't stand the 'overshooting' S.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:26 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
Quote:
Bojcha's preset does have an better control of the loud S sounds, but overall the sound is not what i'm looking for.
I know that Hans' motivation for StereoTool is that some processors make the s sound like an f or something like that.
Hans does not like that, and voila, Stereotool was born.

So if Hans decides to leave it this way, i'm fine with it, but i think i will go look for another processor because i can't stand the 'overshooting' S.
Sure it does. "Sound" is something else.

Also when you find other processor let us know what it is. I'm really interested to see how it wll control loud "S" sounds without killing transients in that area.

_________________
control point
control point2


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:52 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:55 pm
Posts: 70
I will try and make an recording today of the rousing s that im annoyed by.
Im also going to try and record some other stations, and the way they handle with that.

It is really very clear noticable so that should make it easy to detect in software i guess?
Maybe the frequency de esser could have a strictness slider which determines the ratio between aggressive de-essing and killing transients?

To be continued tonight....


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
There is no de-esser in any other FM processor. What you hear on radio is HF clipper/limiter.
And that's why i recomended last band limiter. Also you an tune how wide will that band be, limiter speed or even tu use MB 2 for all that.

_________________
control point
control point2


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited