Kewl
Tonight I managed to do something I thought was impossible: I created a phase linear lowpass filter that filters at 60 Hz (1 waveform is 1/60 sec = 16 ms long) - with a latency of only 2.2 ms!
Unfortunately the CPU load is currently about 16 (!) times higher than that of the normal lowpass filter... Still, the fact that it is possible at all (which is not at all what I expected...) might open opportunities for very low latency 'bass boost' filtering (both the actual 'bass boost' and the similar filter that I'm currently using in normal latency mode to reduce the bass distortion).
The higher CPU load might not be as bad as it sounds - it's roughly equal to the CPU load of the Multiband filter in high quality, HQ on, clipping on and post filter on. And I can decrease the CPU load by increasing the latency, or decreasing the filter accuracy. Both may be needed to reach acceptable levels. The bad news is that I need to run this filter at least 3 times (which, among others, leads to 6.6 ms latency) - and some other filters as well. On the other side, I think I can use the same trick that I used for the lowpass filter also for the Loudness filter, to reach roughly the same quality with far less latency (unfortunately also with a much higher CPU load).