All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 292 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 930 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:11 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Quote:
It is very hard to describe thing like declipper in Finnish :D ... And what do you think about translating those feature names to different languages (which are like trademarks), like Advanced Bass Distortion Protection, in Finnish: Edistynyt basson särösuoja, which in parts.. Edistynyt = Advanced, särö = Distortion and suoja = Protection :D
:)

ABDP - just translate however you want, it's just a description of what it does.
I think that many names like "Multiband compressor" etc. are kinda common in many languages. "Natural Dynamics" is really a 'name', and Declipper maybe too - the rest is just the normal name that everyone uses for it - and whether those names should be translated or not depends on how most people call it. In Dutch for example, everyone calls a 'multiband compressor' just 'multiband compressor' so I wouldn't translate those in the Dutch version. (Otherwise it would be something like 'meerbandscompressor').
I think there are several names that are widely used in English worldwide, and can be in English without problems. A translation may not help. :|

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:19 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it.

If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 5:09 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it.

If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements.
Wow, good news!!! :o

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:31 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:58 am
Posts: 304
That's good news indeed. If you are able to eliminate redundant processing, that sounds like tremendous improvement in CPU utilization.
Looking forward to forthcoming betas.

_________________
visit website


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:18 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 1169
Location: Bulgaria
Yeah i think Hans`s idea is just great !


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:09 am 

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 pm
Posts: 126
Fantastic idea. I try to find my old Pentium 4 computer to run Stereo Tool :mrgreen:

But I guess not only CPU improvement, but also less delay


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:15 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
Quote:
Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it.

If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements.
That mean all bands of those filters must share same settings, like "crossover settings" ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:26 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it.

If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements.
That mean all bands of those filters must share same settings, like "crossover settings" ?
Yes. Unfortunately...


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:00 pm 

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 170
Location: Finland
Well if only few steps use different bands it would still improve performance, so there could be option to use "common bands" or "independent" per filter?


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:40 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 pm
Posts: 126
Quote:
Well if only few steps use different bands it would still improve performance, so there could be option to use "common bands" or "independent" per filter?
Yes, which one of the MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost needs really different crossovers? Every step you can have less is better!


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 292 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 930 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited