All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous 143 44 45 46 47102 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:15 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think there's any need for 5 interface modes, maybe 2 or 3 will do.
+1
Will keep the 5 modes for now, and later check the differences between the modes to determine if some can be removed. When describing the different modes I had difficulty describing the difference between Advanced and Expert so it probably makes sense to combine those.

Simple mode is useful for people who really don't know what they are doing.
Basic mode should be good for the average user who knows other audio processors and quickly wants to get started with Stereo Tool.
Advanced and Expert... I don't know.
Extreme Tweaker - contains settings that normal people should never need to use, people have already suggested hiding these settings behind a password. Contains things like multiband band frequencies and steepness etc.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:29 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 125
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think there's any need for 5 interface modes, maybe 2 or 3 will do.
+1
Will keep the 5 modes for now, and later check the differences between the modes to determine if some can be removed. When describing the different modes I had difficulty describing the difference between Advanced and Expert so it probably makes sense to combine those.

Simple mode is useful for people who really don't know what they are doing.
Basic mode should be good for the average user who knows other audio processors and quickly wants to get started with Stereo Tool.
Advanced and Expert... I don't know.
Extreme Tweaker - contains settings that normal people should never need to use, people have already suggested hiding these settings behind a password. Contains things like multiband band frequencies and steepness etc.
Hans,

I agree with you.

paragraphic is much more simple and intuitive

PS. bass boost, no longer needed, with the equalizer, much better results and no artifacts.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:32 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
PS. bass boost, no longer needed, with the equalizer, much better results and no artifacts.
It doesn't do the same thing as the equalizer - but I think the Bass Shape section in the clipper does a much better job than Bass Boost, so it might indeed be a candidate for removal.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4231
As for EQ.. now with better scale it's bit difficult to 'draw' shape for lower frequencies.
3 or 4 bands are more then enough..
One of simplest PEQ but also very good quality with fully phase linear is http://www.liquidsonics.com/software_filtrate.htm
3 sliders per band (as any other PEQ)
With this EQ i can even make awesome HPF :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:54 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 125
Quote:
Quote:
PS. bass boost, no longer needed, with the equalizer, much better results and no artifacts.
It doesn't do the same thing as the equalizer - but I think the Bass Shape section in the clipper does a much better job than Bass Boost, so it might indeed be a candidate for removal.
Hans,
I tried to advanced clipper - bass shape, no good result, rather well with eq. (see photo)
http://i.imgur.com/d115g9C.gif


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:57 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 125
Quote:
As for EQ.. now with better scale it's bit difficult to 'draw' shape for lower frequencies.
3 or 4 bands are more then enough..
One of simplest PEQ but also very good quality with fully phase linear is http://www.liquidsonics.com/software_filtrate.htm
3 sliders per band (as any other PEQ)
With this EQ i can even make awesome HPF :)
great, as always Bojcha, this would be a perfect solution.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:28 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 1169
Location: Bulgaria
Bojcha , Hans know what is the problem ..
I always use the RMS option. But you said was fixed. No it`s not.
Both Monitor option in MB and Bass Boost with Difference presents this "blop blop"
In different songs this "blop" is different bad :)

And yeah there is from 39 to 40 beta increase about 5-6 % CPU power. But from beta without new MB to now it`s about 10-12% at all.


Last edited by DJ-DOGGY on Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:42 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:30 pm 

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:19 am
Posts: 140
Quote:
As for EQ.. now with better scale it's bit difficult to 'draw' shape for lower frequencies.
3 or 4 bands are more then enough..
One of simplest PEQ but also very good quality with fully phase linear is http://www.liquidsonics.com/software_filtrate.htm
3 sliders per band (as any other PEQ)
With this EQ i can even make awesome HPF :)
Yes Yes Yes!! That's is what I meant.
Way and way easier then drawing

_________________
The Power of Sound

''Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything.'' - Plato


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4231
Quote:
Bojcha , Hans know what is the problem ..
I always use the RMS option. But you said was fixed. No it`s not.
Both Monitor option in MB and Bass Boost with Difference presents this "blop blop"
In different songs this "blop" is different bad :)
Well... i almost don't hear it with RMS (beta039).. also it actually has bit less artifacts then listening on monitor.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:38 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
As for EQ.. now with better scale it's bit difficult to 'draw' shape for lower frequencies.
3 or 4 bands are more then enough..
One of simplest PEQ but also very good quality with fully phase linear is http://www.liquidsonics.com/software_filtrate.htm
3 sliders per band (as any other PEQ)
With this EQ i can even make awesome HPF :)
No, because internally I would still have to convert it to a graph like this - with yes same issues. Do you need steeper slopes for low frequencies?


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous 143 44 45 46 47102 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited