All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 511 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 4:49 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
With this new beta, I recomend some new (default) settings..

"Distortion" section in "Advanced Clipper"

- Clipping from 0hz up to = 100Hz or 120Hz.
- Drop to no clipping = 300-400Hz. (i am testing 400 now still good)
- Clip bass below = -1dB or lower for louder presets. For mid loud preset -2dB is still good!
- Dynamically reduce bass to = 20% lower then "Clip bass below"

Problem was that area 0-100-400 was flat. now it works as how it suppose to work.. 100 rise to 400Hz.
For audio that meaning more mid-bass especially for louder presets. More kick and punch.
Bojcha, just asking: A long time ago you complained about distortion in lower frequencies in voices. I never heard those. My question: Doesn't that get worse when you increase the 2nd frequency slider? Because, by moving that slider the block of audio that is clipped *together* with the lowest bass frequencies also gets bigger.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 1169
Location: Bulgaria
I have no difference like Chris said ....
But now i have it too when i installed 003 .. CPU goes high with average 8-10% ...

And this is when enable this synchronization .. is this CPU hungry like this ( i mean is this normal ) ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:42 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Synchronization can use a lot - depending on the resampling quality setting.

But, do you also see an increase if you don't use this?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:57 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 1169
Location: Bulgaria
No , without it ... it`s normal like 7.01 ... 7.00 ...


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:15 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
Quote:
Bojcha, just asking: A long time ago you complained about distortion in lower frequencies in voices. I never heard those. My question: Doesn't that get worse when you increase the 2nd frequency slider? Because, by moving that slider the block of audio that is clipped *together* with the lowest bass frequencies also gets bigger.
You mean on "voice vibrations"? (how we internally call it)
Answer is no. And it should not since frequencies around 2nd sliders (250-400Hz) and so 100-350/400Hz are higher then 0-100Hz which are those that makes "vibations" on mids (voices)

Also.. with new fix in 7.02 things are better but there is still that 'edge' at end of 2nd slider freq! also between 1st and 2nd slider freq.
1st/2nd slider - 100-400Hz Noise - http://i.imgur.com/TwQpR.png
1st/2nd slider - 100-400Hz sweep - http://i.imgur.com/8mwWX.png


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:27 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
Bojcha, just asking: A long time ago you complained about distortion in lower frequencies in voices. I never heard those. My question: Doesn't that get worse when you increase the 2nd frequency slider? Because, by moving that slider the block of audio that is clipped *together* with the lowest bass frequencies also gets bigger.
You mean on "voice vibrations"? (how we internally call it)
Answer is no. And it should not since frequencies around 2nd sliders (250-400Hz) and so 100-350/400Hz are higher then 0-100Hz which are those that makes "vibations" on mids (voices)

Also.. with new fix in 7.02 things are better but there is still that 'edge' at end of 2nd slider freq! also between 1st and 2nd slider freq.
1st/2nd slider - 100-400Hz Noise - http://i.imgur.com/TwQpR.png
1st/2nd slider - 100-400Hz sweep - http://i.imgur.com/8mwWX.png
No I meant the distortion that you heard in some tracks in LOW voice frequencies.

Can you tell me what settings you used when generating these images? I've done the same test with a sweep yesterday and here it looks perfect - no hole at 400 Hz at all...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
ABDP settings - http://i.imgur.com/iqzIv.png
sweep result - http://i.imgur.com/Zp8Ph.png


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:17 am 

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:26 pm
Posts: 885
Bojcha,

I think Hans is asking about the situation where you and a few others heard something that a lot of the rest of us did not, which ended up being "corrected" at the time with the "Reduce Asymmetric Bass" checkbox.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:03 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
No it's not that.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:50 pm 

Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:42 am
Posts: 123
Location: Australia
Bit reluctant to report this as I'm as yet unable to determine an exact sequence of events that make this happen. But in 7.02 SA on XP when loading presets, it occasionally (maybe once every 10 times or so) seems to fully reverse/swap the L/R input channels. When it happens, it stays that way until another preset is loaded.

If I come across a sequence of events that can force reproduce the change I'll report back. AJ


Last edited by Storm905 on Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 511 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited