Stereo Tool
https://forums.stereotool.com/

Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA
https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?t=4448
Page 73 of 102

Author:  phantomfm [ Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Hope the Daylight in your new office will do you good :mrgreen:

Author:  hvz [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Quote:
Hope the Daylight in your new office will do you good :mrgreen:
Come by and visit me next time you're in the area! Then you can also use my swings :)

My new office is the one on the right (the guy in that office on the photo went to another place in the same building).
My old office is the one just above the stairs.


Image

Author:  alschoen [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

HVZ,

How do I work there? It would seem a great way to relax.

Al Schoen

Author:  hvz [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

BETA052:
- Identical to BETA050 and BETA051
- CPU load reduction of 4% compared to 051 - 3% coming from AZIMUTH correction, 1% coming from the new Multiband (measured using PhantomFM's 80s preset).

When I was looking at the performance difference between version 050 and 051 I saw some other performance related things that I didn't like, and I've improved those.

Total improvement is about 4% on my system. The improvements in the new Multiband compressor - I replaced occurrences of 'divss' by 'rcpss', when needed combined with a 'mulss' - might actually have more effect on older systems - the compiler doesn't automatically perform them because "newer systems don't need them anymore" - but I still clearly see a difference on my i7, older systems (P4 etc) might even show a bigger difference. rcpss is less accurate than divss but it's smooth (so it doesn't sound bad) and accurate enough.

Stand alone: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... 04-052.exe
Winamp DSP: http://www.stereotool.com/download/dsp_ ... 04-052.exe
VST: http://www.stereotool.com/download/vst_ ... 04-052.dll

Author:  Gerrie K [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Great Hans,

On server 2008 system more than 5%.......

Author:  radiofreak [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Quote:
My new office is the one on the right (the guy in that office on the photo went to another place in the same building).
My old office is the one just above the stairs.
:shock: Thought, you're working in a record-studio-like atmosphere with thick walls and damping material all around, but this looks like you're on holiday ;)

Author:  Brian [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Quote:
I replaced occurrences of 'divss' by 'rcpss', when needed combined with a 'mulss'
I'm going to ask a question that's way over my head, at least for the moment, while I do some research (after sleep), but:

Why are you using the scalar instructions instead of the packed / parallel instructions?

Author:  hvz [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Quote:
Why are you using the scalar instructions instead of the packed / parallel instructions?
I use the parallel instructions in most of the performance sensitive code, but not everything is suitable to be parallellized.

In this specific case, the compressor, each sample depends on the samples before it. So I cannot process the next sample until I've processed the current - that's why I cannot process samples in parallel (cannot is a big word, it might be possible to find some tricks or to parallellize parts of the code. I just haven't seen them yet.)

Author:  Chris [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Nice one Hans, in this latest beta, i hear better Bass and especially Vocals, more clear all the freq.!!!

Author:  hvz [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 7.03 BETA

Quote:
Nice one Hans, in this latest beta, i hear better Bass and especially Vocals, more clear all the freq.!!!
Hm, compared to which other beta? The sound should be the same as in 050 and 051, otherwise I did something wrong (even if it sounds better it would still indicate a bug).

Page 73 of 102 All times are UTC+02:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/