Stereo Tool

Yes but how to implement these links? What does 1>2 mean?

1>2 means mix (coupling) between band 1 and 2 .. 2>3 mix between band 2 and 3.. etc...

btw.. that mixing between bands is slightly needed for this MB, to slightly make sweep more flat.

So, 1>2 at 100% means that in band 2 I use the average reduction of band 1 and 2? Of completely band 1? Or do I take the maximum level in the envelope? Or.......? That's what my question is.

I would guess that using the average is the answer.

Also, in case of 1>2 and 2>3, does that mean that 1 affects 3 via 2? (If so I would prefer having a 'band link matrix').

Hm.. same as in compressor L and R.. you need to use higher, more attenuated channel / band, i think.

0% working independent bands.
100% generated bands like gain reduction.

The hard part is in the intermediate values​​, I think that using the mean of a band over the other as you say may be the way.

Shot with an idea to develop values​​:

With Coupling (0%):
Band1 = 5 dB reduction
Band2 = 3 dB reduction

With Coupling (30%):
Band1 = 5 dB reduction
Band2 = reduction = 3 + ((5-3) * 0.30) = 3.6 dB (instead of 3 dB)

Orban 8600 has implemented a coupling between bands, but it is unclear as is the implementation, at least I still do not understand more than a functional level.

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)

if the sound does not change much, it seem to be no problem for me hans!

I may have found something better than band coupling. Not 100% sure yet, need to think a bit more. Tomorrow I'm visiting PhantomFM (he was here a few weeks ago and now he's going to show me some other HW interface). Will brainstorm with him tomorrow

If it's not see TOO low (say below 4% or so), very slightly less highs. much more constant sound.

Great!

Hans I send you a PM whith a Beta Preset from Passive Agressor

_________________
Garbage in is Garbage out !

Watch what you are doing!