Stereo Tool https://forums.stereotool.com/ |
|
Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?t=4989 |
Page 7 of 30 |
Author: | gpagliaroli [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Quote: Quote: It is very hard to describe thing like declipper in Finnish
![]() ![]() ![]() ABDP - just translate however you want, it's just a description of what it does. I think that many names like "Multiband compressor" etc. are kinda common in many languages. "Natural Dynamics" is really a 'name', and Declipper maybe too - the rest is just the normal name that everyone uses for it - and whether those names should be translated or not depends on how most people call it. In Dutch for example, everyone calls a 'multiband compressor' just 'multiband compressor' so I wouldn't translate those in the Dutch version. (Otherwise it would be something like 'meerbandscompressor'). ![]() |
Author: | hvz [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it. If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements. |
Author: | gpagliaroli [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 5:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Quote: Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it.
Wow, good news!!! If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements. ![]() |
Author: | phoenix [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
That's good news indeed. If you are able to eliminate redundant processing, that sounds like tremendous improvement in CPU utilization. Looking forward to forthcoming betas. |
Author: | DJ-DOGGY [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Yeah i think Hans`s idea is just great ! |
Author: | Edgar [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Fantastic idea. I try to find my old Pentium 4 computer to run Stereo Tool ![]() But I guess not only CPU improvement, but also less delay |
Author: | Bojcha [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Quote: Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it.
That mean all bands of those filters must share same settings, like "crossover settings" ?
If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements. |
Author: | hvz [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Quote: Quote: Whoa. Here's an interesting idea that I need to post before I forget it.
That mean all bands of those filters must share same settings, like "crossover settings" ?If MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost all use the same bands... I could greatly optimize the CPU load - the separation into bands would only need to be done once instead of 4 times, and MB and ND could share the (relatively ecpensive) smoothed volume measurements. |
Author: | Modulator [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Well if only few steps use different bands it would still improve performance, so there could be option to use "common bands" or "independent" per filter? |
Author: | Edgar [ Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 7.32 BETA |
Quote: Well if only few steps use different bands it would still improve performance, so there could be option to use "common bands" or "independent" per filter?
Yes, which one of the MB, ND, Noise Gate and Stereo Boost needs really different crossovers? Every step you can have less is better!
|
Page 7 of 30 | All times are UTC+02:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |