Quote:
Quote:
...what I'm mentioning really does help EVERYONE, not just me.
Yes, I agree.
I think that my "aggressive tone" has led to an interesting discussion here.
IMO we have much more consensus than antithesis.
Perhaps. My line of thinking is that if AMD had made such a thing as my same processor core (Athlon64 3700+ San Diego revision), but it was equipped with at least 2MB cache, but probably more towards 4MB cache, I wouldn't notice any issue, much like those of you who have newer processors. As Hans keeps adding things, it ends up being too much to run inside the 1MB cache that my processor has, and thus has to go out to main memory, causing the CPU to stall waiting for main memory. If he doesn't optimize and then starts exceeding the capacity of processors with 2MB cache per core, they'll start noticing the performance hit too.
It really does pay off to optimize any kind of realtime processing to as small a memory footprint as possible, that way there is more overhead for future features, as well as overhead to handle additional load from other programs that happen to be running at the same time.
Quote:
Quote:
I'm trying to avoid the Y2.012K bug...

The only way to avoid that, is to use a MAYA soundcard !
Nah... Too much inca in their manuals...