sum mono or dual mono ...hm, some processors have mono control
| Stereo Tool https://forums.stereotool.com/ |
|
| Stereo Tool 5.00 https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?t=1991 |
Page 21 of 29 |
| Author: | Bojcha [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
- it has 25us at output also.. Comrpessed ..mmmm now what ? - With this two AGCs i have problem to UP input signal because it's already high. and some left/right waveing is occuring - 2nd agc |
|
| Author: | hvz [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
Quote: - it has 25us at output also.. Comrpessed ..mmmm now what ?
Hm... Should I treat the signal as mono in the 2nd AGC? (That might make sense - it's set more aggressively so differences between left and right immediately lead to volume differences.)
- With this two AGCs i have problem to UP input signal because it's already high. and some left/right waveing is occuring - 2nd agc |
|
| Author: | Bojcha [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
sum mono or dual mono ...hm, some processors have mono control
|
|
| Author: | hvz [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
Quote: sum mono or dual mono ...hm, some processors have mono control
Mono control?I could add a slider to switch between full stereo (current situation) and full mono... Separate for both AGC's (assuming that I keep 2, but based on my own tests and your responses as well, I think I will, although I'll probably keep the 2nd one turned off by default) |
|
| Author: | Bojcha [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
if there is not lot of job we can try ... Just .. not mono Audio .. just mono detecting. |
|
| Author: | hvz [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
Quote: if there is not lot of job we can try ...
LOL Just .. not mono Audio .. just mono detecting.  Yes of course! That's what I meant  And should be very easy to add (just averaging the 2 RMS values - well, RMS averaging that is) |
|
| Author: | hvz [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
This is (as usual...) a bit more tricky than I expected. I think that in case of mono processing, I need to calculate the minimum volume of the two channels, and then use that for both. Just taking the average level would lead to (assuming silence on one channel): - Twice as loud sound on the other channel. More difficult for 'remove remaining peaks'. - Multiband gets a twice as loud input on the channel with sound. |
|
| Author: | Bojcha [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
 Only 'mono' fileter in ST is Single band limiter/compressor? how you do that (?)
|
|
| Author: | Bojcha [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
I am very clossee... (bass punch and voices) Attachment:
load in:http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... r_BETA.exe or http://www.stereotool.com/download/dsp_ ... r_BETA.exe |
|
| Author: | hvz [ Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 5.00 |
I've uploaded a new version where you can control the stereo separation - at 100% it's identical to the previous version, at 0% the two channels are identical in volume (except when the difference gets too big and 'remove remaining peaks' starts to kick in). Note: This is an update of BETA2, not of BETA (Bojcha, I saw that you're still using BETA instead of BETA2... BETA2 _should_ be slightly _better_ than BETA!) Winamp DSP plugin: http://www.stereotool.com/download/dsp_ ... _BETA3.exe Stand alone version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... _BETA3.exe VST version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/vst_ ... _BETA3.dll VST version (No SSE2): http://www.stereotool.com/download/vst_ ... _BETA3.dll Command line version: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... _BETA3.exe Note: New sliders are NOT yet saved to disk! Edit: Hm... When testing this version further, I think I could just as well set the first AGC default channel separation setting near 0%. IF it's needed, the 'remove remaining peaks' setting will cause one of the two channels to drop if - otherwise - peak removal would have to kick in. Edit #2: I discovered a 'bug': If I play a beep and set 'remove remaining peaks' at 100%, no peak removal should happen - but it does (caused the the smoothing of the behavior at input level near target level). Will have to check what's wrong there. |
|
| Page 21 of 29 | All times are UTC+02:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|