All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous 114 15 16 17 18102 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:01 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Ok I did a bunch of tests, so far I hear no negative effect of the attack change. So maybe it's good this way.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:29 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Quote:
A query, you are using look-ahead at the compressor?
No, not yet. But the RMS smoothing algorithm should reduce the need for one.
It is true that aid in smoothing RMS since discarded isolated peaks, but the look-ahead helps anticipate abrupt and start before compression. That improves even more.
But first without look-ahead and when the correct behavior will add the details :)

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4231
Now compressor goes into Hard Clip with Inf:1 and atack under 4ms. FF / Peak.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Now compressor goes into Hard Clip with Inf:1 and atack under 4ms. FF / Peak.
That's right, for this configuration, since the ratio is really high 1000:1 :roll:

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:27 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Quote:
This is indeed VERY interesting (and different from what I do!):
Code:
        // dynamic selection: attack or release?
        double  theta = rms > env ? att : rel;

        // smoothing with capacitor, envelope extraction...
        // here be aware of pIV denormal numbers glitch
        env = (1.0 - theta) * rms + theta * env;

        // the very easy hard knee 1:N compressor
        double  gain = 1.0;
        if (env > threshold)
            gain = gain - (env - threshold) * slope;

Edit: Ok, got it now. Current code is wrong. I'm calculating attack and release on the gain! Will fix it... Again.. :(
@Hans: I sent you a pm you can help 8-)

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:35 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
Now compressor goes into Hard Clip with Inf:1 and atack under 4ms. FF / Peak.
That's right, for this configuration, since the ratio is really high 1000:1 :roll:
No, release is wrong. Even at a release of 100 seconds it looks clipped.

Aaah... Was switching to Attack mode as soon as the measured signal is above threshold... Must be if it's above envelope!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now compressor goes into Hard Clip with Inf:1 and atack under 4ms. FF / Peak.
That's right, for this configuration, since the ratio is really high 1000:1 :roll:
No, release is wrong. Even at a release of 100 seconds it looks clipped.
ok, then something is wrong ... :cry:

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:45 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
You responded before I did:
Aaah... Was switching to Attack mode as soon as the measured signal is above threshold... Must be if it's above envelope!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
You responded before I did:
Aaah... Was switching to Attack mode as soon as the measured signal is above threshold... Must be if it's above envelope!
Is true, this can be observed in the current beta, adjusting Release to a high value and observing the gain reduction VU.

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:37 pm 

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:26 pm
Posts: 885
Quote:
Ok I did a bunch of tests, so far I hear no negative effect of the attack change. So maybe it's good this way.
Still can't really participate here because of cpu load, however, a question:

Is the goal here to use this singleband as the individual band filter for multiband similar to now?


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous 114 15 16 17 18102 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited