Stereo Tool
https://forums.stereotool.com/

Stereo Tool 6.10
https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?t=3065		 Page 127 of 213
Author:  hvz [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Quote:
lol .. now i don't understand this beta93 protection at all.
Ow? Same one as before, just with clearer descriptions :shock: . Ok, for voice vibrations, the 1st slider now controls HOW MUCH vibration you want to allow. So setting it higher means MORE vibrations.
Author:  phoenix [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Just tested beta92 (VST) - highs, vocals are cleaner. More airy. But substantially less strict clipping even if the slider is all the way to the right. This is in comparison to beta89. Slamming bass sounds bad in beta92.
Author:  hvz [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Quote:
Just tested beta92 (VST) - highs, vocals are cleaner. More airy. But substantially less strict clipping even if the slider is all the way to the right. This is in comparison to beta89. Slamming bass sounds bad in beta92.
I suppose that's with the 2nd shortcuts checkbox enabled?
Author:  phoenix [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Quote:
I suppose that's with the 2nd shortcuts checkbox enabled?
As in the one meant for Upsampling? The preset with which I am testing has Upsampling disabled. So, that doesn't seem like having any effect irrespective of whether it's toggled ON or OFF.
Author:  Bojcha [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Quote:
Quote:
lol .. now i don't understand this beta93 protection at all.
Ow? Same one as before, just with clearer descriptions :shock: . Ok, for voice vibrations, the 1st slider now controls HOW MUCH vibration you want to allow. So setting it higher means MORE vibrations.
Something is not good. i need to set very agressive some sliders to remove some voice distortions, but then sound is not good.
till beta91 was better.
I other hand, seems to much better and more are protected highs, maybe too much.
And still remains same question. why fixed frequency 0-300Hz? same in all erlier betas.
Author:  hvz [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Quote:
Quote:
I suppose that's with the 2nd shortcuts checkbox enabled?
As in the one meant for Upsampling? The preset with which I am testing has Upsampling disabled. So, that doesn't seem like having any effect irrespective of whether it's toggled ON or OFF.
No I meant the 2nd shortcuts checkbox. The 2nd one below the strictness slider.
Author:  phoenix [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Quote:
No I meant the 2nd shortcuts checkbox. The 2nd one below the strictness slider.
Apologies for brevity in my question, but I meant the same - the check box for taking shortcuts for Upsampling. Currently, the settings I am using doesnot employ upsampling. The check box for taking shortcuts for CPU, does not have any (perceptible) effect.
I can describe the beta92 sound as 'too much unclipped sub-bass'...sounds weird... and kills the punch. I like the cleaner highs of this beta though.
Overall I liked beta89 the most. Skipped the intermediate ones.
Author:  hvz [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Well I guess it must be the simplifications then. Although I don't understand that you say it's clipping far less strictly - if I look at the output it looks pretty strict here... And the simplifications don't affect the clipping strictness at all.
Author:  Bojcha [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Is this default for beta92 ?
Image
Author:  hvz [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
Allowed graininess should be x2.00 (which is also better), except for that, yes.

I can confirm now that some sounds are not handled well at all by the new filter: The mina04 track sounds _great_ if I don't turn any other processing on and only use Loudness, but if I turn everything off it suddenly doesn't work anymore. Dunno why. I'm at Leifs place now finishing the declipper library for the Omnia 9, so I don't have time to look into it - maybe later tonight.
Page 127 of 213 All times are UTC+02:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/