Stereo Tool https://forums.stereotool.com/ |
|
Stereo Tool 6.10 https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?t=3065 |
Page 118 of 213 |
Author: | eldoradofm [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
And can you check the 48 kHz tone. All the tones have 100.1% MPX as expected. Only that tone has 93.6% and i checked that it was at 1.00 and that phase was at 0. EDIT: When i try the same with composite overdrive 105% i don't get 100.1% mpx anymore with the test tones. But i get 99.0% for the test tones and 70.6% for the 48 kHz tone. Hmm... and not all the time 70.6% now. I checked again and it's at 96.3% and when i check again it's at 73.3%. So there's definitely something wrong there. |
Author: | hvz [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
Quote: @Hans... what about Beta79??.. this i have on air... I didnt try Beta84. and i register and load the same preset.!
BETA085 has a new and better sounding clipper. But it also has a much higher CPU load. There's still an issue on my todo list to optimize it further.
|
Author: | DJ-DOGGY [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
Also a good song for tests ...especially in the beginning with very loud high`s http://www17.zippyshare.com/v/9199655/file.html |
Author: | hvz [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
Quote: The composite limiter is now causing artifacts with the fm transmitter calibration tones.
Hm, the calibration itself IS done afterwards, but the tones are injected earlier. I guess I need to turn the composite limiter off when test tones are played.
Is it possible to move the calibration to go after the composite limiter to avoid this? |
Author: | Bojcha [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
New AGC faster dwn_spd is not good! i cannot get any good under 200% Evanescence - My Immortal |
Author: | hvz [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
Quote: And can you check the 48 kHz tone.
Actually I think something is wrong with the tool that you're using to measure it. I've recorded the Stereo Tool output to a file and opened it in a wave file editor. 48 kHz is EXACTLY 1/4th of 192 kHz, due to that you get the same 8 sample values repeated over and over. So in a zoomed-out waveform it does indeed look a lot softer. But, if you zoom in and the wave editor starts to interpolate values, they suddenly reach the peak level again.All the tones have 100.1% MPX as expected. Only that tone has 93.6% and i checked that it was at 1.00 and that phase was at 0. EDIT: When i try the same with composite overdrive 105% i don't get 100.1% mpx anymore with the test tones. But i get 99.0% for the test tones and 70.6% for the 48 kHz tone. Hmm... and not all the time 70.6% now. I checked again and it's at 96.3% and when i check again it's at 73.3%. So there's definitely something wrong there. It also makes sense that you get a different behavior each time: The peak level just depends on WHICH 8 sample values you get. So if you start generating the tone again, it might start at a different spot, causing diferent sample values to be generated. However the output of the sound card is indistinguishable! |
Author: | eldoradofm [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
I tried making test tones with adobe audition. I tested with 53 kHz tone and 48 kHz tone. Both are set to -3dB. In MpxTool i get exactly 100.0% with both tones, so why is there no problem when i use that? Both files played with winamp trough VAC to MpxTool. EDIT: Looking zoomed in to my test tones both files have exactly the same audio level. |
Author: | hvz [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
Quote: New AGC faster dwn_spd is not good! i cannot get any good under 200%
Ok I hear what you mean. I'm changing the default value to 200%, hope that suffices. (Even at 200% sudden loud spikes are still handled better than before).Evanescence - My Immortal For the future, I have a change planned that - if I'm right - should make the AGC much more resilient against volume drops caused by loud voices. Actually it's a pretty simple change - but I'm probably not going to implement it in version 6.20 anymore. Anyway, if that idea works I should be able to lower this value again. |
Author: | hvz [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
Quote: I tried making test tones with adobe audition. I tested with 53 kHz tone and 48 kHz tone. Both are set to -3dB.
For 48 kHz, try setting the start phase to 45 degrees. I've just tried it in CoolEdit (older version of Audition) and with start angle of 0 degrees I get a peak level of 0 dB, with start angle at 45 it's -3 dB. The RMS level is identical though (-3 dB).
In MpxTool i get exactly 100.0% with both tones, so why is there no problem when i use that? Both files played with winamp trough VAC to MpxTool. |
Author: | Bojcha [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Stereo Tool 6.10 |
Quote: For the future, I have a change planned that - if I'm right - should make the AGC much more resilient against volume drops caused by loud voices. Actually it's a pretty simple change - but I'm probably not going to implement it in version 6.20 anymore. Anyway, if that idea works I should be able to lower this value again.
I have some idea and it's very simple actually half is already in current AGC just some changes ... if you want to hear...
|
Page 118 of 213 | All times are UTC+02:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |