Stereo Tool :: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper

Q9300 (not "E") will not work. with ST, FM, new composite and Full quality!

well.. since you are searching whole configuration, you can always order something like that.. and get E8x00 CPU for example..

I replaced E5200 and E5700 with E8500 and clocked both to 3.60GHz (easy) and all is nice now. Ofc, XP pro 32bit.

Intel Pentium E5200 @ 2.50GHz 1302 910 34.26
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz 3189 404 24.53

The second is better, tomorrow I call that shop, maybe they have a bit faster one.
Yes, Stokkemask is important. Station who pumped up their power will hear not much, but when your Stokkemask isn't right, then they can get a warning and fine after if it's still not right.

E8300: 1994 / 2 cores = 997. Close to my Q9450 which can do at most 80% quality, 70% with Stokkemask.

@Bojcha - Where did you manage to find those 'older' processors? Did you get them through the used market? I hope your OS install didn't give trouble after the change or did you do a fresh install?

Author:	Bojcha [ Mon May 20, 2013 11:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
Q9300 (not "E") will not work. with ST, FM, new composite and Full quality!

Author:	Edgar [ Mon May 20, 2013 11:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
Intel Pentium E5200 @ 2.50GHz 1302 910 34.26 Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz 3189 404 24.53 The second is better, tomorrow I call that shop, maybe they have a bit faster one. Yes, Stokkemask is important. Station who pumped up their power will hear not much, but when your Stokkemask isn't right, then they can get a warning and fine after if it's still not right.

Author:	Edgar [ Mon May 20, 2013 11:35 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
Quote: Q9300 (not "E") will not work. with ST, FM, new composite and Full quality! Thanks, I will not order that one.

Author:	Bojcha [ Mon May 20, 2013 11:40 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
well.. since you are searching whole configuration, you can always order something like that.. and get E8x00 CPU for example.. I replaced E5200 and E5700 with E8500 and clocked both to 3.60GHz (easy) and all is nice now. Ofc, XP pro 32bit. Took some pics: http://i.imgur.com/KbEYx0y.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ddQUwdU.jpg done: http://i.imgur.com/3sR6dlY.jpg

Author:	2Sense [ Tue May 21, 2013 9:49 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
@Bojcha - Where did you manage to find those 'older' processors? Did you get them through the used market? I hope your OS install didn't give trouble after the change or did you do a fresh install?

Stereo Tool https://forums.stereotool.com/

Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?t=4822	Page 2 of 3

Author:	Edgar [ Tue May 21, 2013 12:20 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
Quote: well.. since you are searching whole configuration, you can always order something like that.. and get E8x00 CPU for example.. I replaced E5200 and E5700 with E8500 and clocked both to 3.60GHz (easy) and all is nice now. Ofc, XP pro 32bit. I can get an system with E8300 2,83 gHz. It's Core2Duo. The last one, so maybe already sold

Author:	hvz [ Tue May 21, 2013 1:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
Quote: Intel Pentium E5200 @ 2.50GHz 1302 910 34.26 Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz 3189 404 24.53 The second is better, tomorrow I call that shop, maybe they have a bit faster one. Yes, Stokkemask is important. Station who pumped up their power will hear not much, but when your Stokkemask isn't right, then they can get a warning and fine after if it's still not right. The second IS better but not that much, you need to divide the number by the number of cores (assuming that there are at least 2): E5200: 1302 / 2 = 651 -> Running at 50% quality Q9300: 3189 / 4 = 797 Q9450: 3792 / 4 = 948 -> Running at 80% quality, 70% with Stokkemask enabled. So you need to have one that reaches at least about 1200 I think. E8500: 2285 / 2 = 1143, but you overclocked it to 3.60 GHz (originally 3.16) so we need to multiply that by 3.60/3.16 -> 1302. Yea, that should work. Note: Lowering the quality might not be that much of a problem, at the highest Latency setting (4096) you can easily lower it to about 50% without too much effect on the audio.

Author:	hvz [ Tue May 21, 2013 1:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
E8300: 1994 / 2 cores = 997. Close to my Q9450 which can do at most 80% quality, 70% with Stokkemask.

Author:	Edgar [ Tue May 21, 2013 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
Quote: E8300: 1994 / 2 cores = 997. Close to my Q9450 which can do at most 80% quality, 70% with Stokkemask. 80% isn't 100% yet, so it's better to search for another system also for future development it's important too

Author:	Bojcha [ Tue May 21, 2013 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Buffer fast empty in Advanced clipper
http://i.imgur.com/xjXmhMX.png http://i.imgur.com/sA8jfBh.png Quote: @Bojcha - Where did you manage to find those 'older' processors? Did you get them through the used market? I hope your OS install didn't give trouble after the change or did you do a fresh install? Found it or ricardo.ch. Used CPU. Price was 90CHF both. No i did't need to reinstall windows. I however needed bios update since this cpu is newer stepping (E0).

Page 2 of 3	All times are UTC+02:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/