All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:32 am 

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 6:06 am
Posts: 11
Quote:
So why don't you make a recording showing the difference. I know lots of FM stations that switched from $10.000+ boxes (currently available boxes, not old units) to Stereo Tool and don't want to go back - although some of them still have the hardware box as backup.

You think otherwise? Fine. That can mean 2 things:
1. Your taste is different. That's very well possible.
2. Your settings are bad. Also very well possible.

So, record something. So we can hear what you mean. Instead of starting to yell at people. That's impolite. And the only effect is that you will piss people off. If it's a taste issue, other people will not agree with you. If you really serviced over 1000 8100's as you wrote elsewhere (that's 1 per working day for 3 years on end, seriously??), you must know that taste is a very important factor in processing.

You're saying something that several people here don't agree with. So I would say it's up to you to prove your point.
Hi hvz,

Nobody is yelling, just my 2 cents of what i've heard from my ears over various chains.

If you had read all that i've wrote, i said that i'm an engineer for over 20 years!!! Over that time, i serviced +1000 units of Optimod and other sound processors( got that now?)? Yes, seriously!! If you want, i can "teach" you something...

Of course taste is very important, if not the most important part in processing. That's why your ears don't count when you are fine tuning a radio broadcast with nacional coverage and has millions of listeners. Every single listener as is own taste. Spectrum analyzers come in handy here, as well as oscilloscopes, mdo's(if you are into dab or streaming), and also important, a very good "ghost" chain, composed by receiver+pre+amplifier+speakers. Get a good pressed vynil of jazz or rhythm and blues, a very good pick-up(none of that crappy ortofon's...),a turntable very well balanced, a bootle of your favorite drink and tune the chain!


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:34 am 

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 6:06 am
Posts: 11
Quote:
What did you expect? That nobody would argue with you?
No, i expected that anybody argued with me, but with good arguments!
Quote:
So what you mean to say is that you don't understand how ST works. Got it!
I know how ST works, better than you know. Got it???


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:38 am 

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 6:06 am
Posts: 11
Quote:
Here's the thing, del4you2:

Stereo Tool is a great processor. That's a fact. As for the price - it's an excellent processor. In fact, you will not find anything like it on the market, within the price range that an average person like me can afford. And the only processor that can match Stereo Tool and performs equally good or (maybe?) better is an Omnia 9. Now compare the price.

Hans did and is still doing an amazing job on this. A man like him deserves a respect. His product, Stereo Tool, also deserves it. So you should remain silent, unless you have a hard evidence for what you're saying (and I honestly doubt you do). Either way, don't you dare disrespect the man!
Where did i disrespect hvz?

As far is i'm aware, this is a free forum, where anybody can express their opinion. Unless hvz tells me other thing, i'll continue to argue with my experience of 20 years in the business.

And if you dare to confront me, please go ahead. I'm right here. Take your best shot!!!


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:20 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:22 pm
Posts: 367
Quote:
No, i expected that anybody argued with me, but with good arguments!
Good, we expect the same. Saying "I've worked in sound processing a long time so I know everything better" is not a good argument. As Hans said: show us what you mean - record something you think sounds good. Also record the sound you got from Stereo Tool. Then we can compare and have an opinion on the matter.

_________________
Imaging producer & Stereo Tool audio processing consultant


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:31 pm 

Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 3:17 pm
Posts: 65
Quote:
Quote:
What did you expect? That nobody would argue with you?
No, i expected that anybody argued with me, but with good arguments!
Your best arguments are:
Quote:
€ 429.27 is what hvz is asking for the full version of ST. For that price, plus the price of a multicore PC to run this piece of crap, i can buy a Optimod!!! Why stick with crap, when you can get the holy grale???
Quote:
Quote:
So what you mean to say is that you don't understand how ST works. Got it!
I know how ST works, better than you know. Got it???
No you don't.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:32 pm 

Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 3:17 pm
Posts: 65
Quote:
As far is i'm aware, this is a free forum, where anybody can express their opinion.
No it isn't. It's a supportforum for a software called Stereo Tool.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 1:40 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 9:32 am
Posts: 231
Location: Poland
del4you2

I know, you didn't disprespect him, that was just a warning in case you wanted to. In fact, nobody is also going to disrespect you. All we need is some proof behind the things you're claiming.

Now, we're all aware 8100 has its own signature sound. It's just the way the hardware works. It's not transparent. I know you are aware of it too. ST on the other hand isn't transparent either, it can't be due to its "design". The highs get much cleaner with much tighter signal control than 8100 (with no matter what auxiliary cards) could ever approach. The fact is - if you want to 100% reproduce the 8100 sound with ST - you're going to fail. One can approach some timbre of it - but it will never behave exactly like the HW box in question. If you don't like the timbre which ST produces. Well.. surely it doesn't sound like a 30-year old design. It's just too modern for that, with different philosophy behind it. But if you could tell us /or show us what you don't like in Stereo Tool's sound, at least we would know what you're talking about.

Also ST is a software, so it has to be accompanied by some good DACs in order to behave exactly like it should (including DC/tilt control), not to mention the CPU, that also has to be powerful enough (which isn't a problem nowadays).

From my point of view - at its price, Stereo Tool is currently capable of producing MUCH cleaner and louder audio than all Orban boxes, including the newest 8600/8600s designs. The only competitors for it that would match its loudness and clarity come from Telos Alliance - Omnia 7/9 and maybe 11 (both 7 and 9 share part of the alogrithms with ST, which were licensed by Hans to Telos, not the other way round).

Now let's look at the features:
- tight MPX signal control (even tighter with super clean mpx clipper, +150% of audio in 100% modulation)
- perfect MPX filtering (more than 80dB of separation for pilot and RDS, extremely steep filters allowing for 16 kHz freq. response, that is also with composite clipper active)
- declipping of input source (along with expanders bringing back life to squashed material mastered today)
- BS412 compliant mpx power control (mandatory in many countries, what's more - these controls in ST are far more advanced than in any box I've seen)
- Stokkemasker compliant (mandatory in NL)
- RDS encoding built-in
- built in streaming client
- multiple instances possible on one machine
- multiple mpx outputs possible
- synchronization for different transmitters is possible
- AM compability
- asymmetric clipper (AM)

and probably many more that I forgot right now, but please just check the features that 8100 doesn't have.

As for advantages of a software vs HW:
- bug fixes from version to version
- instant update to newer versions (free of charge)
- incredibly flexible - you can choose between number of bands, crossovers etc, realtime
- modular licensing - pay for the features you need, not more. If you need more in the future, just buy access to new features
- HW replacement is dirt cheap (in fact you decide how the platform looks like - and it can be very advanced as well)
- all in one, multi-puropse

Also bear in mind what gjbbgu said - it's a Stereo Tool support forum. So we expect your counter-arguments with regard to ST to be brought into daylight, rather than just empty words.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:30 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
@DylanPetit: To get back to your original question, is this something like what you're looking for? The recordings on the first page are gone so I can't compare - but this is an 80s sound:
http://178.19.127.141/listen_mp3.m3u


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 7:10 pm 

Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:14 pm
Posts: 164
Location: Antwerp
What a non discussion, I have a Orban here and it has it's signature sound, I have a full original Aphex airchain and it has it's own signature sound and I have Breakaway which has it's signature sound and ST is become the most clean processor I heard with room for progression, and I have 30 years experience, both broadcast and live. So if this becomes your argument, you maybe better consider to post your "crappy" comments elsewhere. Nobody will miss you here ;)
Just MY 2 cents.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 9:37 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:25 pm
Posts: 198
Mr. del4you2,

It is high time you recognize that it is only your ("professional") ego arguing.

ST is a positive, inspirational and a highly productive project.

Accept it and enjoy it.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited