Unanswered topics | Active topics


» »

All times are UTC+02:00



Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 72 of 102
  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 … 70 71 72 73 74 … 102 Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
vmp94
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:02 am 

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:39 am
Posts: 36
How about this:
When the user right-clicks on a slider it turns into a input box with the existing slider position value in it. If the user changes the value or leaves it as is and leave text input mode (by clicking elsewhere or pressing enter) then the slider will be set to the numerical value. If the user clears the box and exits text input mode the slider resets to default.
-or-
Make right-click text input and double right click reset to default.
Quote:
I have the feeling that indicators of gain reduction is displayed whenever the values ​​without coupling, because I fail to notice difference with values ​​of 0 or 100%. But if the effect is heard audibly. :|
Me too.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
hvz
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:55 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
I have the feeling that indicators of gain reduction is displayed whenever the values ​​without coupling, because I fail to notice difference with values ​​of 0 or 100%. But if the effect is heard audibly. :|
True!
Top
   
Reply with quote  
hvz
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:49 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
I have noticed an increase in CPU with this implementation, and on my system, can not maintain the without drops in the audio to be able to comment on the change. :(
Just ran it through an analyzer, and I see that *1* single new assembly instruction is accountable for about 8% of the total CPU load! So I believe you :) Will try to improve this.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
hvz
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:32 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
I have noticed an increase in CPU with this implementation, and on my system, can not maintain the without drops in the audio to be able to comment on the change. :(
Just ran it through an analyzer, and I see that *1* single new assembly instruction is accountable for about 8% of the total CPU load! So I believe you :) Will try to improve this.
Wow! One Multiband function took 14% of the total CPU load before, now less than 2%! So I guess this must be a big drop (need to check if I didn't do something wrong though, the effect seems too big)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
DJ-DOGGY
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 1169
Location: Bulgaria
The most CPU loading is coming from the Advanced clipper , but this is a clipper for all the audio frequency specter and do a lot of things i guess , so the MB load will be normalized , Hans will do for sure
Top
   
Reply with quote  
gpagliaroli
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:32 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have noticed an increase in CPU with this implementation, and on my system, can not maintain the without drops in the audio to be able to comment on the change. :(
Just ran it through an analyzer, and I see that *1* single new assembly instruction is accountable for about 8% of the total CPU load! So I believe you :) Will try to improve this.
Wow! One Multiband function took 14% of the total CPU load before, now less than 2%! So I guess this must be a big drop (need to check if I didn't do something wrong though, the effect seems too big)
Good news!!! ;)

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
hvz
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:55 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Output is identical to that of version 050 and the CPU load of the 'band coupling' code is now down from more than 14% of the total to less than 2% of the total... :)
Stand alone: http://www.stereotool.com/download/ster ... 04-051.exe
Winamp DSP: http://www.stereotool.com/download/dsp_ ... 04-051.exe
VST: http://www.stereotool.com/download/vst_ ... 04-051.dll

Development is a bit slow today because I'm also busy moving to a different office :)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
gpagliaroli
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Output is identical to that of version 050 and the CPU load of the 'band coupling' code is now down from more than 14% of the total to less than 2% of the total... :)
will try tonight, but has corrected display gain reduction?

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
hvz
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:09 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
Output is identical to that of version 050 and the CPU load of the 'band coupling' code is now down from more than 14% of the total to less than 2% of the total... :)
will try tonight, but has corrected display gain reduction?
No not yet. Just performance improvement.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
gpagliaroli
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:09 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 600
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Output is identical to that of version 050 and the CPU load of the 'band coupling' code is now down from more than 14% of the total to less than 2% of the total... :)
will try tonight, but has corrected display gain reduction?
No not yet. Just performance improvement.
ok, thanks

_________________
by GAP
"Less is More" (Bob Katz)
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 72 of 102
  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 … 70 71 72 73 74 … 102 Next

» »

All times are UTC+02:00

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited