All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2125 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1125 126 127 128 129213 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:43 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
lol .. now i don't understand this beta93 protection at all.
Ow? Same one as before, just with clearer descriptions :shock: . Ok, for voice vibrations, the 1st slider now controls HOW MUCH vibration you want to allow. So setting it higher means MORE vibrations.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:32 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:58 am
Posts: 304
Just tested beta92 (VST) - highs, vocals are cleaner. More airy. But substantially less strict clipping even if the slider is all the way to the right. This is in comparison to beta89. Slamming bass sounds bad in beta92.

_________________
visit website


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:36 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Just tested beta92 (VST) - highs, vocals are cleaner. More airy. But substantially less strict clipping even if the slider is all the way to the right. This is in comparison to beta89. Slamming bass sounds bad in beta92.
I suppose that's with the 2nd shortcuts checkbox enabled?


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:58 am
Posts: 304
Quote:
I suppose that's with the 2nd shortcuts checkbox enabled?
As in the one meant for Upsampling? The preset with which I am testing has Upsampling disabled. So, that doesn't seem like having any effect irrespective of whether it's toggled ON or OFF.

_________________
visit website


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:56 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
Quote:
Quote:
lol .. now i don't understand this beta93 protection at all.
Ow? Same one as before, just with clearer descriptions :shock: . Ok, for voice vibrations, the 1st slider now controls HOW MUCH vibration you want to allow. So setting it higher means MORE vibrations.
Something is not good. i need to set very agressive some sliders to remove some voice distortions, but then sound is not good.
till beta91 was better.
I other hand, seems to much better and more are protected highs, maybe too much.
And still remains same question. why fixed frequency 0-300Hz? same in all erlier betas.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:41 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Quote:
Quote:
I suppose that's with the 2nd shortcuts checkbox enabled?
As in the one meant for Upsampling? The preset with which I am testing has Upsampling disabled. So, that doesn't seem like having any effect irrespective of whether it's toggled ON or OFF.
No I meant the 2nd shortcuts checkbox. The 2nd one below the strictness slider.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:58 am
Posts: 304
Quote:
No I meant the 2nd shortcuts checkbox. The 2nd one below the strictness slider.
Apologies for brevity in my question, but I meant the same - the check box for taking shortcuts for Upsampling. Currently, the settings I am using doesnot employ upsampling. The check box for taking shortcuts for CPU, does not have any (perceptible) effect.
I can describe the beta92 sound as 'too much unclipped sub-bass'...sounds weird... and kills the punch. I like the cleaner highs of this beta though.
Overall I liked beta89 the most. Skipped the intermediate ones.

_________________
visit website


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:05 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Well I guess it must be the simplifications then. Although I don't understand that you say it's clipping far less strictly - if I look at the output it looks pretty strict here... And the simplifications don't affect the clipping strictness at all.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4229
Is this default for beta92 ?
Image


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 6.10
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:39 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11425
Allowed graininess should be x2.00 (which is also better), except for that, yes.

I can confirm now that some sounds are not handled well at all by the new filter: The mina04 track sounds _great_ if I don't turn any other processing on and only use Loudness, but if I turn everything off it suddenly doesn't work anymore. Dunno why. I'm at Leifs place now finishing the declipper library for the Omnia 9, so I don't have time to look into it - maybe later tonight.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2125 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1125 126 127 128 129213 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited