All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 11:40 am 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 333
Fixed since 8.25 beta 28 by using the new MB slopes without automatic distance correction.


Last edited by \_/ on Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:40 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 1:54 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4151
Thing is that in every band settings usually number is for crossover point. So that can bit confuse since in ST it's not.
Simply just look graph and hover over display to check points.

_________________
control point
control point2


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:11 am 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 333
I tried to achieve something like the example shown below and I did accomplish the desired crossovers but I failed in general:
  1. The midband is asymmetricly shifted to the right because of the upper frequency limit of 24k Hz (for symmetry a band frequency of 100k Hz (!) would be needed).
  2. Though the slopes are set to 24dB per octave the result is much less steeper than in the picture below. Readjusting may help at 10k Hz but not at 100 Hz because of point 1.
Is it possible to achieve a similar result like in the picture?
If so, how? If not, why?

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:45 pm 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 333
When I move two neighbouring bands closer to each other their steepness at the crossover will rise. So steepness depends on the frequency value. Is there a possibility to change them independently, maybe by exposing some internal q parameter or something?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:45 am 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 333
I was playing around and added higher values than 24k Hz directly to the ini-file for the rightmost band. If I remember correctly, then in the past ST automatically resetted such values to the allowed maximum but now they stay put.

Does this mean that values higher than 24k Hz will now work just fine?
(Well the band plot still displays values only up to 24k Hz but I guess it is completely independent from actual processing anyhow.)


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:55 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11187
I suppose so, but please note that if you put audio at very high sample rates into it it will downsample first anyway. So the only way to get any type of behavior above 24 kHz would be to use a non-standard sample rate.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:54 pm 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 333
Sorry, I don't understand.

I don't usually use non-standard sample rates and I don't care that much about audio far outside the audible range.

But I want to do this, e.g.:
If I use 3 bands and want symmetric crossovers at 100 Hz and 10k Hz I need to set the bands to 10 Hz, 1k Hz and 100k Hz (see the picture above).
What I'm interested in is, if ST is able to process that correctly or if it will internally cut it down to 24k Hz (like the band plot suggests)?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 9:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4151
May i ask why cut crossover at 10kHz? That is really unusual and i am trying to think reason for that.

What can be usual is somewhere between 1.5 and 6kHz (2 or 3 bands)

_________________
control point
control point2


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 10:51 pm 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 333
That was just an example with simple numbers, however I sometimes do use 10k Hz for air. Here you can see my typical crossovers for three bands:

Image


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC+01:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited