Stereo Tool
https://forums.stereotool.com/

Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA
https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=30345
Page 12 of 14

Author:  hvz [ Tue Apr 06, 2021 5:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

Ok, that's the complete opposite of what I see. Can you send me your settings and test audio?
sent.
Ok, issue confirmed. And I know the cause: "BAD!" was designed to improved IMD for bass tones, which is at least 95% of all the bass in music, and it works very well on that. But on random bass (bass noise, basically), it makes things slightly worse. (The improvements on bass tones is still much bigger than the detrimental effect on bass noise). I'll see what I can do to improve this, but even with this, you really should still keep it turned on for music.
I think I found a good compromise for the behavior. I've added a setting for it ("Allow distortion on thunder bass (threshold)"), which I'm going to hide in Extreme Tweaker mode. Basically, we do indeed want this filter ("BAD!") to be active on bass tones and not on bass noise ("thunder"), because in the latter case the IMD that's caused by this filter is actually worse than the IMD it's cleaning up. It looks like highs IMD is mainly annoying when it has a pattern in it. "0" is equal to the old behavior, "50" (the maximum) is getting close to turning "BAD!" off. 30 seems to be a good compromise, I haven't been able to detect any added distortion in music so far and the distortion added to pink noise is largely gone. With higher values (50) I do have the impression that there's more distortion - I haven't done a blind test though. The default is currently set to 25, 30 is probably better but I think the risk of adding IMD in music is bigger than any gains from this filter, so without testing a lot more I want to err on the safe side.

On average, a bit more highs get through with this setting > 0 (nearly no effect on other frequencies), which is probably a good thing as long as those extra highs aren't distorted.

I'll run a new build tonight.


Edit: At 50 there's clearly more distortion. 25, 30 and 35 seem to be ok. I'm not too sure when I test it (even in a loop, I think I hear different things every time even with the same settings), but I measured it and - at least for the music that I tested with, 35 seems to be still ok. 50 clearly isn't, both based on listening tests and measurements.

Author:  hvz [ Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

BETA012 posted. There's a new slider, "Allow distortion on thunder bass (threshold)", probably not a great name for what it does... But that setting controls how strongly it tries to reduce IMD, which is bad for random (thunder) bass sounds, good for tones. 50 is bad. 30 and 35 are probably still ok, but I'm not really sure - see my previous post. 0 is old behavior ("BAD!" on in the previous few beta's).

Author:  EliteData [ Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Quote:
BETA012 posted. There's a new slider, "Allow distortion on thunder bass (threshold)", probably not a great name for what it does... But that setting controls how strongly it tries to reduce IMD, which is bad for random (thunder) bass sounds, good for tones. 50 is bad. 30 and 35 are probably still ok, but I'm not really sure - see my previous post. 0 is old behavior ("BAD!" on in the previous few beta's).
maybe its just me but i prefer to use white noise to calibrate ST for music since its flat freqs all across.
can you imagine if a different type of white noise was used that emphasized upper freqs instead of lower freqs ?

Author:  Bojcha [ Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Quote:
Quote:
BETA012 posted. There's a new slider, "Allow distortion on thunder bass (threshold)", probably not a great name for what it does... But that setting controls how strongly it tries to reduce IMD, which is bad for random (thunder) bass sounds, good for tones. 50 is bad. 30 and 35 are probably still ok, but I'm not really sure - see my previous post. 0 is old behavior ("BAD!" on in the previous few beta's).
maybe its just me but i prefer to use white noise to calibrate ST for music since its flat freqs all across.
can you imagine if a different type of white noise was used that emphasized upper freqs instead of lower freqs ?
I use it too, but also many other tones like sine sweep.

Author:  EliteData [ Wed Apr 07, 2021 4:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BETA012 posted. There's a new slider, "Allow distortion on thunder bass (threshold)", probably not a great name for what it does... But that setting controls how strongly it tries to reduce IMD, which is bad for random (thunder) bass sounds, good for tones. 50 is bad. 30 and 35 are probably still ok, but I'm not really sure - see my previous post. 0 is old behavior ("BAD!" on in the previous few beta's).
maybe its just me but i prefer to use white noise to calibrate ST for music since its flat freqs all across.
can you imagine if a different type of white noise was used that emphasized upper freqs instead of lower freqs ?
I use it too, but also many other tones like sine sweep.
the problem is, music is completely random freqs at different amplitudes and waveform shapes.
i have different methods of testing and calibrating, such as injecting a sinewave based tone at the frequencies the MB is set to with white noise at the same dB level and observing the drops at certain frequencies and their bandwidth occupied by the drop.
the same type of testing applies to pre-emphasis, to hear no audible drop differences with pre-emphasis turned on/off but not applied on the output (pre-emph enabled but not to output).
so turning it on and off should produce virtually no difference, thats when pre-emph is calibrated properly, it produces the emphasis needed for AM/FM but without any push-downs on the lows from the mids/highs.

Author:  Bojcha [ Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

maybe its just me but i prefer to use white noise to calibrate ST for music since its flat freqs all across.
can you imagine if a different type of white noise was used that emphasized upper freqs instead of lower freqs ?
I use it too, but also many other tones like sine sweep.
the problem is, music is completely random freqs at different amplitudes and waveform shapes.
i have different methods of testing and calibrating, such as injecting a sinewave based tone at the frequencies the MB is set to with white noise at the same dB level and observing the drops at certain frequencies and their bandwidth occupied by the drop.
the same type of testing applies to pre-emphasis, to hear no audible drop differences with pre-emphasis turned on/off but not applied on the output (pre-emph enabled but not to output).
so turning it on and off should produce virtually no difference, thats when pre-emph is calibrated properly, it produces the emphasis needed for AM/FM but without any push-downs on the lows from the mids/highs.
That's nice. However how about areas between bands? :)

Author:  hvz [ Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

BETA012:
Mac build that asks for microphone access uploaded
WatchCat build with fix for beeps in unregistered version uploaded

Author:  EliteData [ Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

I use it too, but also many other tones like sine sweep.
the problem is, music is completely random freqs at different amplitudes and waveform shapes.
i have different methods of testing and calibrating, such as injecting a sinewave based tone at the frequencies the MB is set to with white noise at the same dB level and observing the drops at certain frequencies and their bandwidth occupied by the drop.
the same type of testing applies to pre-emphasis, to hear no audible drop differences with pre-emphasis turned on/off but not applied on the output (pre-emph enabled but not to output).
so turning it on and off should produce virtually no difference, thats when pre-emph is calibrated properly, it produces the emphasis needed for AM/FM but without any push-downs on the lows from the mids/highs.
That's nice. However how about areas between bands? :)
well that too of course but it depends on the level of slope for each band and how many bands are being used and the respective levels of them (as well as other additional parameters).
my comment was more or less "generalized" to a target regarding calibrating ST and the use of pre-emph.
id rather not make it an "off topic" discussion in this thread though.

Author:  MrKlorox [ Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Watchcat seems to be functioning properly now.
Also, thanks for making the input gain of the plugin menu work when bypassed. 8-)

Author:  Bojcha [ Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Stereo Tool 9.64 BETA

Something is wrong with "Soft Clipping" per MB bands.
I set it to +35dB, so basicly should do nothing, but it rises band level by around 1dB.
--
Some strange bug when changing CPU quality. Claimbigf: In Use!

Page 12 of 14 All times are UTC+02:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/