Stereo Tool
https://forums.stereotool.com/

naomi.one - preset
https://forums.stereotool.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4204		 Page 2 of 2
Author:  Bojcha [ Fri May 11, 2012 1:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
you can simply use EdCast with Lame dll .. say if you need help!
Author:  jony [ Fri May 11, 2012 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
Thanks Bojcha, my automation soft uses lame.exe, i can't use edcast because i have a shoutcast V2 server.

But it seams to be good now, ( i also have some bad mp3's ).
Author:  Bojcha [ Fri May 11, 2012 4:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
ok.. then You can try to replace exe with this one :) (save old one!)

http://www14.zippyshare.com/v/89635578/file.html
Author:  jony [ Fri May 11, 2012 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
tested :shock: don't work i only get noise no audio with this encoder, i use lame.exe 3.99.5.2 64bit
Author:  jony [ Fri May 25, 2012 6:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
Hi Bojcha, any news about new update ?
Greatings
Author:  Bojcha [ Fri May 25, 2012 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
worked with Hans on Loudness... in few days i will finish 2 presets and another one is comming..
Author:  hvz [ Tue May 29, 2012 1:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
If they are ready, please post them - I'm currently finishing version 6.31 and the last thing - which I'm doing right now - is checking which presets to include :)

Btw about encoders: IF you have the chance, esp. for lower bitrates check out 'mp3enc31' from Fraunhofer. It's insanely expensive but really good (and it clearly outperforms Lame and any other encoder I've ever tried).
Author:  Bojcha [ Wed May 30, 2012 4:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
Quote:
Btw about encoders: IF you have the chance, esp. for lower bitrates check out 'mp3enc31' from Fraunhofer. It's insanely expensive but really good (and it clearly outperforms Lame and any other encoder I've ever tried).
That is questionable. Since some codecs sounds better on lower rates and ither on high rates.. etc...

In Jony's case i think files are problem more then stream codec.
Author:  jony [ Wed May 30, 2012 7:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
Quote:
In Jony's case i think files are problem more then stream codec.
Correct Bojcha, mostly they are very old files, and that's why i love ST it makes miracles in this bad files. :roll:
Quote:
IF you have the chance, esp. for lower bitrates check out 'mp3enc31' from Fraunhofer. It's insanely expensive but really good (and it clearly outperforms Lame and any other encoder I've ever tried).
Thanks a lot Hans its allways god to know that. ;)
Author:  hvz [ Wed May 30, 2012 11:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: naomi.one - preset
Quote:
Quote:
Btw about encoders: IF you have the chance, esp. for lower bitrates check out 'mp3enc31' from Fraunhofer. It's insanely expensive but really good (and it clearly outperforms Lame and any other encoder I've ever tried).
That is questionable. Since some codecs sounds better on lower rates and ither on high rates.. etc...
Well, I haven't tested Lame recently, but a few years ago I've compared several MP3 encoders for my stream. And with Lame, I could hear artifacts at any bitrate (even 320 kbit/s). With mp3enc31 there were few artifacts even at 128 - although there's another issue which is that mp3enc crashes when it tries to encode frequencies above 16 kHz, so you have to cut the audio off there. Also the CPU load is a lot higher (at least 10 times as high as that of Lame).

Maybe also important to note is that there are also huge differences between MP3 *DE*coders! Especially avoid installing the MP3Pro plugin in Winamp, because everything else (normal MP3's that is) will sound bad if you do that.
Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC+02:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/