All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:32 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:22 am
Posts: 53
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma USA
I have two CDs with two different masters of the same song. One is older, has significantly more dynamic range intact, but also clearly used an older AtoD encoder and the highs roll off pretty sharply at 20 kHz. The second is newer, is brickwalled, but also clearly used a newer AtoD encoder and the highs extend a little farther, rolling off about 21 kHz.

I understand that this slightest of increase in frequency response will be completely lost over the air or on a web stream.

However, I run all my rips through Stereo Tool's Declipper and Natural Dynamics before saving the final file for use on-air. Additionally, I have been given the impression more modern AtoD and DtoA encoders and decoders sound "better" than the first generation.

My question is, would the restored dynamics and the more modern master be a better final file than the original dynamics and the older master?

I realize I'm likely splitting hairs... but like many of us, I'm pretty obsessive about sound. :-)

P.S. - Although I can certainly see differences between the original dynamics file and the artificially restored dynamics file, I have a hard time hearing one or the other as "better," even if perhaps they sound slightly "different." It's hard to hear which one is more "natural" or "accurate" and thus my asking which is more important: modern mastering or no clipping in the first place.

_________________
Gene Savage
BlackLight Radio
http://BlackLightRadio.com
Tulsa, Oklahoma USA


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:13 pm 

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:03 pm
Posts: 93
Location: Utah, USA
I'd personally pick the older recording/version. What's a khz here or there, really? Especially up above that hear-able range?

_________________
America's Country
Hot Country Hits!


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 3:17 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:22 am
Posts: 53
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma USA
Thanks for the reply, Tim!

I ended up going with the older recording. It sounded brighter, clearer. The newer recording, even after processing, sounded muddy and flat.

I'd still be curious to see what others think. :-)

_________________
Gene Savage
BlackLight Radio
http://BlackLightRadio.com
Tulsa, Oklahoma USA


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited