All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 233 posts ]  Go to page Previous 120 21 22 23 24 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:20 pm
Posts: 149
Quote:
One could use 27, 1500 and 24000 Hz instead, but this makes the bands highly asymmetric, causing changes in sound and band flatness..
It seems to work OK for me with those frequencies.

Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:14 am 

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:39 pm
Posts: 334
Thanks for that optical illusion, JesseG! Tricked me too, for a minute. :D

With all slopes the same, the midband looks asymmetric. So you changed them to correct that. However the asymmetry comes from the fact that the outer bands intersect at a different frequency than the maximum of the midband. What you did only moved the asymmetry from the midband to the outer bands, which admittedly, looks more pleasing to the eye but doesn't solve the problem.

Additionally your settings decrease the midband output level, so you didn't improve flatness either. (Yes, one could compensate for that, but that's not the point.)

So in the end you just proved my point, although your nice graph seems fine at first glance.


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 5:17 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 1164
Location: Bulgaria
Hans,

Do you know why this is happened when i start ST without input signal . Half of MB is at some "level" , the other half is not.


Attachments:
MB2.JPG
MB2.JPG [ 5.84 KiB | Viewed 7815 times ]
Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 5:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 4163
Probably on program start soundcard "clicks" and then gates hold that.

_________________
control point
control point2


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 5:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 1164
Location: Bulgaria
No way, the input sound card is a virtual cable - no clicks or any sound from it.

Also on the other MB this is not happened.


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:28 pm 

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:25 am
Posts: 100
Hans, many AM processors had a phase positioning circuit that would favor whichever way the input audio was dominant. Voices and trumpets tend to peak more, one way or the other, and the processor would take advantage of that by rotating the phase to make the dominant side more positive. One advantage of this was that less clipping was required to keep positive levels high.

Is this something you could incorporate into the AM side of the processor without having to go through major gymnastics?

Thanks.

Jack


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:53 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11211
Quote:
Hans, many AM processors had a phase positioning circuit that would favor whichever way the input audio was dominant. Voices and trumpets tend to peak more, one way or the other, and the processor would take advantage of that by rotating the phase to make the dominant side more positive. One advantage of this was that less clipping was required to keep positive levels high.

Is this something you could incorporate into the AM side of the processor without having to go through major gymnastics?

Thanks.

Jack
How did they switch without causing some plop or other bad artifact? I read that some early AM processors did this but they had a big plop in the audio when switching.

Since in many cases asymmetry will always be in the same direction (at least for presenters etc.), it might make sense to add a manual invert checkbox, in case the peaks are in the wrong direction. But, if you use the phase rotator, this is hardly the case anymore.


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 12:18 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 11211
I'm going back to Bass In Your Face since it's really an in-your-face bass.

"Warm Bass" doesn't cover it - it's also deep bass.
"Bass Dominator" - There's already an audio processor called 'Dominator'.
"Fat bass" - Just don't like how that sounds (like it's a cheap effect, and it's not!)
"Tube amp bass" - I don't have a clue what that would sound like...
"Natural Bass" - we already have Natural Dynamics, I don't want to keep using the same word everywhere. Although it's probably the best description of all.
"True Bass" - just sent to me by Bojcha, I kinda like it :)

As a side not to explain what's so special about this:

- If I generate a square wave at 50 Hz, I get a sequency of harmonics at 50, 150, 250, 350, 450 etc. Hz. Then, if I completely remove the 50 Hz ground frequency, this algorithm will generate it!
- If I generate a sine wave at 150 Hz, and then run this algorithm, it does NOT generate a tone at 50 Hz, in fact, it does (nearly) nothing.
So, it basically generates bass that's supposed to be there.

If anyone has a better idea based on this description, or wants to vote for any of the names, let me know! I'm planning to build the 7.80 release this weekend (since I'm in the US next week and there I probably won't have time to do anything).


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 12:52 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:20 pm
Posts: 149
Quote:
However the asymmetry comes from the fact that the outer bands intersect at a different frequency than the maximum of the midband.
No, they intersect exactly in the center of Band 2.
Quote:
Additionally your settings decrease the midband output level, so you didn't improve flatness either. (Yes, one could compensate for that, but that's not the point.)
Actually, based on my calculations, the middle band is up to ~ 1.4dB too loud. Band 1 and 3 sum to -13.5dB in the band center / intersection. Therefore Band 2 should peak at ~ -2.06dB for those crossover settings to be flat, but it peaks at ~ -0.6dB.

Of course this is only fully relevant if nothing dynamic is happening with the input and/or processing. I'm sure it sounds better the way Hans' crossover algorithms work.


Last edited by JesseG on Sat Nov 07, 2015 1:09 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Stereo Tool 7.73
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 1:05 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:20 pm
Posts: 149
Quote:
Hans, many AM processors had a phase positioning circuit that would favor whichever way the input audio was dominant.
Quote:
How did they switch without causing some plop or other bad artifact? I read that some early AM processors did this but they had a big plop in the audio when switching.
It would still have audible effects even if the switching was somehow made inaudible. This is partly because most types of speaker & headphone drivers respond differently to positive and negative voltage, but mostly because we can hear when the polarity of asymmetrical sound waves are reversed.


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 233 posts ]  Go to page Previous 120 21 22 23 24 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited